X

Why Job Interviews are Useless

<p><img class&equals;"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-7820" src&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;collegecareerlife&period;net&sol;wp-content&sol;uploads&sol;2014&sol;03&sol;Interviewers-300x200&period;jpg" alt&equals;"" width&equals;"300" height&equals;"200" &sol;><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The New York Times recently published an article on the <a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;nytimes&period;com&sol;2017&sol;04&sol;08&sol;opinion&sol;sunday&sol;the-utter-uselessness-of-job-interviews&period;html&quest;&lowbar;r&equals;0" class&equals;"broken&lowbar;link">uselessness of job interviews<&sol;a>&period; As stated in the article&comma; researchers have known for many decades that interviews aren&&num;8217&semi;t an accurate assessment of one&&num;8217&semi;s abilities&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>One reason interviews aren&&num;8217&semi;t useful is that traits noticed during an interview can overshadow more important&comma; objective factors&period; The New York Times article mentioned a woman who was hired her solely for her composure after she arrived late for the interview&period; However&comma; she had been told the wrong time and did not know she was late&comma; so the basis for hiring was completely off target&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The woman&&num;8217&semi;s experience is a good example of how interviewers can often let one action or answer to a question be the determining factor in who gets a job or a spot in a lucrative academic program&period; An individual&&num;8217&semi;s actions or answers while interviewing may not be consistent with their normal actions&period; It&&num;8217&semi;s much better to look at several objective factors in order find the best fit for a position&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Interviews are a waste of time&comma; particularly for job seekers who often go through multiple interviews with the same company&period; Sometimes a candidate has been chosen before the interviews even start and the interviews are simply a show to &&num;8220&semi;prove&&num;8221&semi; the hiring process was fair&period; And often candidates who are better at feigning enthusiasm are given a job over more reserved candidates who may be better suited to the position&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Have you ever been asked an illegal or just plain stupid question during an interview&quest; Most people probably have&comma; and these <a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;collegecareerlife&period;net&sol;how-to-answer-dumb-interview-questions&sol;">terrible interview questions<&sol;a> show how pointless interviews are for job seekers&period; Sometimes these questions are solely to embarrass candidates or to make them uncomfortable&period; Interviewers may also have a misguided idea that strange questions can provide insight into one&&num;8217&semi;s personality&period; In any case&comma; most common interview questions aren&&num;8217&semi;t helpful in determining an individual&&num;8217&semi;s potential success&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>One of the worst things about job interviews is that they make discrimination easier&period; Not just discriminating based on race or gender&comma; but on looks&comma; age&comma; religion and lifestyle factors&period; Although it may be illegal to ask certain questions&comma; most job seekers will feel pressure to answer every question for fear of seeming uncooperative&period; And interviewers can be sneaky in finding out information&comma; taking on a friendlier tone in hopes a candidate will let his or her guard down&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Job interviews are not logical&comma; objective or fair&period; So why do companies and institutions still use them&quest; Possibly because it&&num;8217&semi;s always been done&period; Maybe hiring managers like the power they hold over job seekers during an interview&period; And most disturbingly&comma; they can provide a way to discriminate based on a variety of factors&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Andrea: